Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Learn more about CollectivesStack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack Internal How about using System.nanoTime? I think that already uses the performance counters of the machine and there is no need to write a native wrapper.
Update: According to this article on clocks and timers in the jvm in the section "Clocks and Timers on Windows"
System.nanoTime() is implemented using the QueryPerformanceCounter/QueryPerformanceFrequency API
How about using System.nanoTime? I think that already uses the performance counters of the machine and there is no need to write a native wrapper.
How about using System.nanoTime? I think that already uses the performance counters of the machine and there is no need to write a native wrapper.
Update: According to this article on clocks and timers in the jvm in the section "Clocks and Timers on Windows"
System.nanoTime() is implemented using the QueryPerformanceCounter/QueryPerformanceFrequency API
How about using System.nanoTime? I think that already uses the performance counters of the machine and there is no need to write a native wrapper.
