Timeline for Lisp binary size
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2016 at 18:33 | comment | added | Daniel Kochmański | ECL has both bytecode compiler/interpreter and compilation to native code via C compiler. ECL is generally slower than SBCL and CCL, but produces very small binaries. I'm not sure what @SamuelEdwinWard means by limitations (except the fact it's slower) – it's fairly complete and has number of features. Could you elaborate a little on that? | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 10:26 | history | edited | Rainer Joswig | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 294 characters in body |
| Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45 | history | edited | Rainer Joswig | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 20 characters in body |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 16:23 | comment | added | Samuel Edwin Ward | ECL compiles to C and produces rather small executables by using shared libraries, but it's limited in a lot of ways. | |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 16:17 | comment | added | Ole Krüger | Thank you, that is what I was searching for! | |
| Jun 14, 2012 at 16:16 | vote | accept | Ole Krüger | ||
| Jun 14, 2012 at 15:39 | history | answered | Rainer Joswig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |