Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • @svick: Fair enough. How would you explain Math.Pow being around since the first release of .NET though? Would Hans's point of not wanting to over-complicate the ECMA standard be the reason then? Commented Jul 2, 2012 at 15:30
  • @Ani It would still mean more work for most everyone who does anything with IL. The fact that that work would have to go into first versions of the tools doesn't change much. Commented Jul 2, 2012 at 23:08