Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Learn more about CollectivesStack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternalI believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone diddo this and it ran on both Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't do what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone did this and it ran on both Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't do what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone do this and it ran on both Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't do what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone dodid this and it ran on both Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't todo what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone do this and it ran on Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't to what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone did this and it ran on both Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't do what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone do this and it ran on Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't to what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
Ref: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.3https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/ctors#init-methods
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone do this and it ran on Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't to what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
Ref: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.3
I believe you can call a constructor from a constructor. It will compile and run. I recently saw someone do this and it ran on Windows and Linux.
It just doesn't to what you want. The inner constructor will construct a temporary local object which gets deleted once the outer constructor returns. They would have to be different constructors as well or you would create a recursive call.
