Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 7
    Almost all e-mail clients, including webmail clients, block external images by default since several years ago, to a large part exactly to prevent using this technique of determining if a mail has been opened. Commented Jan 7, 2010 at 18:45
  • Please dont do this for public facing services. This is almost 100% considered "questionable" activity in email. Many applications will block this behaviour directly, and many scanning applications will look for images that cannot be seen by the user (0,0 size, 100% transparent, etc) Commented Jan 7, 2010 at 18:51
  • 1
    I agree with GrayWizard, it's better to include a real image in the email, like a logo, and send the unique ID inside the url like <img src="blah.com/logo.php?id=1234"> and that url spits out the mime header & binary data for an actual image, not a HTML page. Commented Jan 7, 2010 at 19:25