Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

Interesting indeed, but very complicated for routine tasks, I think.

henrebotha
– henrebotha

2013-12-12 16:12:05 +00:00
Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 16:12
1

What is somewhat horrid is the way I must follow to find the function whose result has caused the Assertion error: traceback object converted to a string, regex searching in this string, passing the group to glabals to find the function object, getting the doc of the function ! I didn't succeed to extract the function or its name more directly from the traceback object. - But the basic idea may be interesting: conditional functions can be added simply without changing the except block.

eyquem
– eyquem

2013-12-12 16:22:37 +00:00
Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 16:22
@henrebotha I got a strong simplification

eyquem
– eyquem

2013-12-12 16:59:51 +00:00
Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 16:59

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow