Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • Using the filter option is a great idea... however, you don't need to create a contains method for Array. I converted your idea into a one liner... Thanks for the inspiration! Commented Oct 26, 2010 at 18:39
  • You don't need to define the contains() function. JS includes() does the same thing. Commented Jan 12, 2019 at 8:37