Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Okay, I've heard about that being faster. Thanks! Commented Aug 12, 2010 at 23:29
  • @msw, is my answer cut off in your browser? The full sentence is "Asynchronous IO in one thread is going to be way more performant and easy to debug than anything that uses multiple threads and blocking IO." Commented Aug 13, 2010 at 0:08
  • I should have been more clear; sorry. The OP hasn't even made a case for needing asynchronous IO, and your philosophy of "get it right, first" noted above is a good stance. But I fear it isn't impressing the OP, oh well ;) Commented Aug 13, 2010 at 1:30