Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

This seems a good idea, but why scaffold does not go this way? Also I assume you recommend to use rescue_action if there are several such methods?

Andrey Shchekin
– Andrey Shchekin

2010-10-27 15:27:59 +00:00
Commented Oct 27, 2010 at 15:27
Ok, I am going to assume you meant a rescue_from or rescue_action_in_public handler for multiple methods, in which case Chubas reply here is a subset of this one and I should accept this one as an answer.

Andrey Shchekin
– Andrey Shchekin

2010-10-27 18:33:24 +00:00
Commented Oct 27, 2010 at 18:33
As a general rule I use rescue_from for things that cannot be easily recovered from, and rescue when I can handle it. When a create fails, typically you just render the new form again. Something more abstract generally returns a pretty "Uh oh" page.

tadman
– tadman

2010-10-27 21:47:50 +00:00
Commented Oct 27, 2010 at 21:47

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow