Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • I don't think that the C++ committee feels the onus is on them to use the language idioms "correctly", nor even define what "correct" usage is (though they can certainly give guidelines). To that end, while a person's teachers, bosses and friends may have a duty to steer them one way or another, I believe the C++ committee (and therefore the standard) does not have that duty. Commented Dec 15, 2017 at 15:23
  • Yeah, I just read N2951 and I agree that the standard committee has no obligation to add unnecessary limitations regarding the usage of a function. But the names of these two function templates (move and forward) are indeed a bit confusing seeing only their definitions in the library file or standard documentation (23.2.5 Forward/move helpers). The examples in the standard definitely help understand the concept, but it might be useful to add more remarks to make things a bit more clearer. Commented Dec 20, 2017 at 6:33