Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • Maybe while subclassing and you override variables? Commented Aug 9, 2018 at 6:11
  • internal marks the property available in the module only, it is really important when developing a library or framework – obviously it must not be removed. Commented Aug 9, 2018 at 7:36
  • @holex He means adding the keyword explicitly. Commented Aug 17, 2018 at 20:45
  • @J.Doe, then the best way is to make an proposal on Swift Evolution Forums about removing the keyword entirely and see what community says, if that keyword seems redundant. Commented Aug 20, 2018 at 7:28
  • @holex Since the keyword doesn't have to be included every time, it isn't redundant, the same applies for the keyword noescaping. Commented Aug 20, 2018 at 8:28