Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    That's an array of ordinary character type, char const[]. What am I missing? Commented Aug 21, 2023 at 11:33
  • 6
    @Eljay I guess the question asks if cv-qualified ordinary character type is still ordinary character type. I'd expect wording like "An array of (possibly cv-qualified) ordinary character type [...]" Commented Aug 21, 2023 at 11:37
  • 1
    Addendum: a string literal is already const-qualified. Does not say anything about volatile-qualification oc. See eel.is/c++draft/lex.string#1 Commented Aug 21, 2023 at 11:55
  • 1
    @Eljay What am I missing? The definition of ordinary character type Commented Aug 21, 2023 at 12:07
  • 2
    Related to CWG251, CWG2185, CWG2448 Commented Aug 21, 2023 at 13:30