Revisions to Awaiting multiple Tasks with different results

edited body

edited Oct 22, 2024 at 19:37

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await tasksTasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await tasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await Tasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

deleted 2 characters in body

edited Oct 21, 2024 at 11:53

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await tasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interesestedinterested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await tasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interesested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await tasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

answered Oct 20, 2024 at 4:37

While writing a compiler I became interested in syntax for awaiting multiple tasks (and getting their values).

For example:

var (employees, books) = await [ dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employee>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Book>(), ];

Then I realized that the following syntax, almost identical, is already possible in C#:

var (books, employees) = await tasks( dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Books>(), dbConnection.GetAllAsync<Employees>());

If you're interesested, see the NuGet package AwaitMultiple. It can be used like this up to 16 arguments.

Return to Answer