Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 1
    So you're allowing extra loops just so you wouldn't have to label "for"? Commented Sep 12, 2023 at 17:48
  • @vytaux how this is allowing extra loops? I am curious, because I would do something like this as well and just want to know whether this is better or worse? Commented Oct 15 at 2:46
  • Look at the answer by RusJaI Commented Oct 26 at 18:24