Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

Don't fully understand this answer either but in testing with several values it did yield unique results. Those same values using XOR did not yield unique results so I is clearly a better hash. I posted another question an packing two 32 into a 64 and then extracting if you want to pick up a quick answer.

paparazzo
– paparazzo

2012-04-01 17:21:30 +00:00
Commented Apr 1, 2012 at 17:21
It's not just a better hash, it is a perfect hash :)

Hans Passant
– Hans Passant

2012-04-01 17:27:50 +00:00
Commented Apr 1, 2012 at 17:27

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow