Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • $\begingroup$ Hello quellenform, thank you for your response. It works perfectly for the presented case, but as I feared, and as I mentioned in the bounty announcement, if the pattern to be corrected appears on two consecutive lines, it results in a mess (see the attached file). Is there maybe a way to select and replace the patterns one by one, to avoid the problem? That is to say: find a line that presents the criss-cross pattern, eliminate it, fill with the quads, then move on to the next line. In any case, you have faithfully responded to my request, so I approve your response and thank you immensely. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2024 at 8:54
  • $\begingroup$ Example modified to show where it fail: blend-exchange.com/b/EmJ2Xkvz/ $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2024 at 8:55
  • $\begingroup$ @crucchi Yes, you're right, in this particular case, where several such patterns are directly adjacent to each other, the selection fails. I am sure that there is a solution for this too. ...let me see. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2024 at 9:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @crucchi In your particular case (where several crossed sections meet) you can use this solution. Here I process the two fundamentally different patterns separately: blend-exchange.com/b/d7prnvjs $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2024 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ I have tried it, it works. I will study it to understand how it works. Many thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2024 at 10:55