Timeline for Print the missing primes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26 at 8:31 | answer | added | Themoonisacheese | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 23 at 7:31 | answer | added | Rosario | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 17, 2024 at 20:00 | answer | added | Shaggy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 17, 2024 at 0:02 | answer | added | ErikDaParrot | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 30, 2023 at 13:11 | answer | added | lyxal♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 30, 2023 at 12:58 | answer | added | lyxal♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 11, 2016 at 23:52 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/808097225133977601 | ||
| Dec 11, 2016 at 18:57 | history | edited | Addison Crump | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 24 characters in body |
| Dec 11, 2016 at 18:51 | answer | added | Martin Ender | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 10, 2016 at 0:05 | answer | added | Stewie Griffin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 19:38 | answer | added | James Hollis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 14:13 | answer | added | AdmBorkBork | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 10:26 | answer | added | JAD | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 10:22 | answer | added | t-clausen.dk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 10:19 | answer | added | Titus | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 9:51 | answer | added | Blue | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 7:11 | answer | added | Emigna | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 6:55 | answer | added | hwm | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 5:23 | answer | added | Mama Fun Roll | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 4:39 | answer | added | JayDepp | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 2:02 | answer | added | Brad Gilbert b2gills | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 1:47 | comment | added | Addison Crump | @GregMartin Yes, they can - but they cannot be found within the first half of the factors. It makes sense not to include 7 in the missing primes of 48 as 7^2 is greater than 48. (my reasoning lies there) | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 1:06 | answer | added | Dennis | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 0:44 | answer | added | LegionMammal978 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 0:34 | comment | added | Greg Martin | "Only primes below the square root can actually be involved within the factors of x" isn't true: a number can have one prime factor that's larger than its square root. Indeed, your first two examples (5 and 20) have this property, as do all primes, twice all odd primes, .... | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 0:05 | answer | added | ETHproductions | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 22:50 | answer | added | user62131 | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 22:48 | answer | added | TheBikingViking | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 22:44 | answer | added | Luis Mendo | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 22:40 | history | asked | Addison Crump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |