Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • \$\begingroup\$ According to my tests, the optimal choice from 0123456789+-*.% for octave is 139-%, which produces an array of 18: 1 2 3 4 6 8 9 13 16 19 22 31 38 39 88 91 92 93. So you can gain another 3 numbers :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 9, 2016 at 15:48
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ very crude brute-force that I used to get the 18-number solution: pastebin.com/umckG0VS \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 9, 2016 at 15:55
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I found that solution too, but that was after seeing the python submission and it's essentially the same thing. Nice job bothering to make a brute force script. 😊 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 9, 2016 at 16:35