Skip to main content
Code Golf

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @ceilingcat Then one could remove the 8- and have valid code still. 0xA-4+8 should work, though. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 15, 2017 at 3:28
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Would 0xA+32/8 work? (Without something being removable, that is.) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 28, 2017 at 4:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ØrjanJohansen I think it does. None of +32, +3, +2, +3/8, +2/8, /8 or +8 produces the right output. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 28, 2017 at 4:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh, or 0xD+4*8/32. No wait, that would shorten to 0xD+4/3 wouldn't it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 28, 2017 at 4:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Using the same approach as my Haskell answer gives a score of 74, if it is not reducible in any way: Try it online! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 28, 2018 at 23:50