Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

19
  • 12
    \$\begingroup\$ Brilliant! Glad to see ;# is getting attention! \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 23, 2017 at 6:41
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ You can test your output here, as ;#+ is a superset of ;#. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 23, 2017 at 7:02
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Can the output contain additional character? ;# ignores all other characters, so the generated program would still work. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 23, 2017 at 7:23
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @Benoît: The modulus is irrelevant when generating code, since it's always easier to generate code that uses the minimum number of ;. Secondly, 127 is correct, as stated in the linked question that contains the specification of the ;# language. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 24, 2017 at 7:16
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ This isn't really transpiling. "Generate #; code" is a better title. I'm going to change it to that. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 24, 2017 at 20:24