Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I like the challenge, but technically wouldn't such a system also be incapable of displaying source code? Except for Piet, of course. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 18, 2014 at 21:40
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @ValekHalfHeart you can load the source code from a different machine \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 18, 2014 at 21:41
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ And how do you define human readable? For example, my handwriting is readable to some humans (at least one) and not to others. (By the way, 2^(2x2)=16, enough glyphs for all 11 digits. ;) ) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 18, 2014 at 22:19
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't understand the title at all, I don't understand how ASCII art can be ok when we cannot use text display, and the question very much needs a definition of "calculate PI". \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 19, 2014 at 9:07
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ What does "calculate pi" really mean? Could I hard-code a bitmap of the first 20 decimals? (Doesn't make use of any built-in PI constant or similar) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 19, 2014 at 18:40