Timeline for As many near-repdigit primes as possible
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2022 at 17:32 | comment | added | user108721 | The problem was the stupid compiler that insists the -l options come after the file name but in 2022 still doesn't give you a sensible warning message if you don't do that. | |
| Nov 16, 2022 at 17:24 | history | edited | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 | jic |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 15:58 | history | edited | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 | improvement? |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 14:52 | comment | added | jdt | I think it's more likely the temperature of the CPU. On my laptop, it starts at 120% cpu utilization but drops to about 80% after a while. Turning down the AC or putting your computer in a freezer might make the biggest difference :-) | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 14:35 | comment | added | c-- | @jdt not really, I just got 593 with yours vs 588 with mine in 5 minutes. I think it could be that mp::pow is not a good way of generating ones or the fact that I'm searching for the non-repdigit from the end (which could affect the rate at which they're found if for these values of n they're easier to find from the start). | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 13:52 | comment | added | jdt | MSVC 2019 does support it with /std:c++latest. My laptop is pretty much useless for benchmarking, do you get a noticeable improvement with your code vs mine? | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 13:37 | comment | added | c-- | yeah, it's too bad compilers don't support std::print yet, but {fmt} is really good. | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 13:00 | history | edited | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 | replace 10 -> ten |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 3:20 | comment | added | jdt | i love std::format. The whole std::cout thing was crappy from the start. | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 2:45 | history | edited | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 | tidying |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 1:43 | history | edited | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 | renaming |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 1:13 | history | edited | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 | specify compiler flags |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 0:50 | history | answered | c-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 |