Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ ++++++++[<++++++>-] why not this for 48? 8*6 vs. 4*4*3 \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 10, 2014 at 13:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Cruncher Added. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 10, 2014 at 19:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ Why did it get longer? is that because of the "bug fixing"? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 10, 2014 at 19:52
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Cruncher Yes, I had to fix a bug where it would output a for 11. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 10, 2014 at 20:15