Timeline for Evolution of "Hello World!"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Oct 31, 2014 at 9:17 | comment | added | Fabinout | Still pretty impressive | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:52 | comment | added | Optimizer | Can we have this discussion somewhere else rather than on my answer ? :) | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:47 | comment | added | Martin Ender | @user23013 Everything is better than HQ9+, but that doesn't make them programming languages. | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:42 | comment | added | jimmy23013 | @MartinBüttner Both HTML and Markdown are at least better than HQ9+ (or Huby). And there are console browsers to convert them to text. | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:09 | history | edited | Optimizer | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 526 characters in body |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:04 | comment | added | Martin Ender | As I said, I don't think HTML is a programming language either by our standards. But for the purpose of this particular challenge it's probably fine to loosen those rules (but ideally Calvin's Hobbies should state that). | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:03 | comment | added | Optimizer | Well, If HTML is a language, Markdown is too. Its the same relation between JS and Closure. Also, given this challenge (1 lang per ans), these rules ought to be loosened a bit. | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 10:01 | comment | added | Martin Ender | It's getting questionable whether that's a programming language. (Same for HTML actually.) | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 9:57 | history | answered | Optimizer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |