Timeline for Find a point's position on the integral Hilbert curve
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 22:01 | history | rollback | Martin Ender | Rollback to Revision 4 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 17:08 | history | edited | Joe Z. | CC BY-SA 3.0 | LaTeX. |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 17:44 | vote | accept | Joe Z. | ||
| Dec 9, 2014 at 20:21 | comment | added | Joe Z. | No, I mean your code shouldn't have a top-down approach that assumes a maximum size. If you need an INT_MAX checker for stability, you can assume that you will never receive input that would trigger that case. | |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 17:49 | answer | added | Peter Taylor | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 13:01 | history | edited | Peter Taylor | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Add some more test cases to cover a class which was previously uncovered |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 12:16 | comment | added | Optimizer | By your last line, do you mean that if we are implementing the iterative approach of the algorithm, we should not have while (s<INT_MAX) in the loop ? | |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 10:10 | history | edited | Peter Taylor | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Add a small test case which tests that even and odd iterations are handled differently |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 3:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/542159982977089536 | ||
| Dec 9, 2014 at 2:51 | answer | added | MickyT | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 0:06 | history | edited | Joe Z. | CC BY-SA 3.0 | That's a bug. |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 22:50 | history | asked | Joe Z. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |