Timeline for ASCII topology pt 1: Can I count on you?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2017 at 6:48 | comment | added | Matthew Roh | Possible sequel of knot or not? | |
| Feb 15, 2017 at 5:01 | history | edited | Wheat Wizard♦ | edited tags | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 5:48 | answer | added | Mac | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 1:00 | answer | added | blutorange | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 14:30 | comment | added | Matt Noonan | @blutorange Yes, self crossings absolutely are allowed. I can't believe I forgot to add an example like that! Your colored example is also valid. | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 11:49 | comment | added | blutorange | Perhaps you should explicitly forbid or allow loops that cross themselves (eg pastebin.com/5RLZuULG) Currently, they are detected by the ruby solution, but not by the SnakeEx solution. | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 8:12 | comment | added | blutorange | Colored version of the loops as it might be hard to see: imgur.com/sf87vsn | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 8:03 | comment | added | blutorange | Each corner has got a | and -. Or does that mean, out of the 4 adjacent characters, 2 need to be - and |, and the other 2 spaces? Wouldn't that invalidate the current example for four? | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 7:43 | comment | added | blutorange | I think you should add this (pastebin) as a test case unless I'm missing something and it's not valid input. There are 6 loops; I only tested it online with the SnakeEx solution and it outputs 12. | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 4:43 | answer | added | Sp3000 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 29, 2015 at 3:21 | answer | added | BMac | timeline score: 18 | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 23:55 | answer | added | edc65 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 20:07 | answer | added | Cristian Lupascu | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 12:53 | history | edited | Martin Ender | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 65 characters in body |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 12:33 | comment | added | Matt Noonan | @Martin: I'm afraid not. My storage space is really at a premium, so I can't spare all those extra spaces. | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 10:07 | answer | added | VisualMelon | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 9:49 | answer | added | KSab | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 8:41 | history | edited | Martin Ender | edited tags | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 4:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/580218578823151616 | ||
| Mar 24, 2015 at 1:58 | comment | added | Matt Noonan | @feersum: No, the two edges attached to the + will always be visible. | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 1:55 | comment | added | feersum | Can one of the sides of an 'under strand' be a +? | |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 1:45 | history | edited | Matt Noonan | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 109 characters in body |
| Mar 24, 2015 at 1:30 | history | asked | Matt Noonan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |