Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ -1 for use of xor/transformations. The changeling to ShapeScript conversion looks to much like encryption to me. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 4, 2015 at 16:45
  • 15
    \$\begingroup\$ @MegaTom You can vote as you see fit, but the questions frowns upon encryption because it takes a key, a constant only known to the cop that puts the robbers at a significant disadvantage. The conversion is an unkeyed transformation. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 4, 2015 at 17:56
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ ShapeScript, 67 bytes: 0"#002?'+'&'0'$'0?2?-@2?>*+00'&!++'1'*'0'+@1?$0?''&@_2-2?*@+@"3*!@#. I've given up on finding a Changeling for it, though. Even interspersed with mostly useless statements, I haven't been able to get more than 20 bytes in. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 5, 2015 at 5:41
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @MegaTom I'm actually fairly disappointed by the given solution. I was expecting something significantly more clever than 92.9% useless code. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 6, 2015 at 15:10
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @primo It took a bit more tinkering, but I found this Changeling that works with Python 2 as well. I don't know how clever my answer is, but my plan of posting a cop with a loophole that had to be found to crack it seems to have worked. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 6, 2015 at 15:28