Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#Bash/coreutils/dc, 25

Bash/coreutils/dc, 25

dc<<<"1 `seq -f%g* $1`p" 

This forms a dc script and evaluates it. So ,with input of 5, we evaluate

1 1* 2* 3* 4* 5*p 

It took my machine 2.05 seconds to compute 10000! here (that's factorial ten-thousand, with 36693 digits), so seems to scale reasonably well. For the zero case, seq produces no output, so the dc script is just 1 p which produces the correct output 1.

#Bash/coreutils/dc, 25

dc<<<"1 `seq -f%g* $1`p" 

This forms a dc script and evaluates it. So ,with input of 5, we evaluate

1 1* 2* 3* 4* 5*p 

It took my machine 2.05 seconds to compute 10000! here (that's factorial ten-thousand, with 36693 digits), so seems to scale reasonably well. For the zero case, seq produces no output, so the dc script is just 1 p which produces the correct output 1.

Bash/coreutils/dc, 25

dc<<<"1 `seq -f%g* $1`p" 

This forms a dc script and evaluates it. So ,with input of 5, we evaluate

1 1* 2* 3* 4* 5*p 

It took my machine 2.05 seconds to compute 10000! here (that's factorial ten-thousand, with 36693 digits), so seems to scale reasonably well. For the zero case, seq produces no output, so the dc script is just 1 p which produces the correct output 1.

Source Link
Toby Speight
  • 7k
  • 1
  • 31
  • 43

#Bash/coreutils/dc, 25

dc<<<"1 `seq -f%g* $1`p" 

This forms a dc script and evaluates it. So ,with input of 5, we evaluate

1 1* 2* 3* 4* 5*p 

It took my machine 2.05 seconds to compute 10000! here (that's factorial ten-thousand, with 36693 digits), so seems to scale reasonably well. For the zero case, seq produces no output, so the dc script is just 1 p which produces the correct output 1.