Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • \$\begingroup\$ Related and related. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 30, 2016 at 17:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Isn't this just a dupe of the second question as as far as I can tell, you've just changed the winning condition? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 30, 2016 at 18:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @muddyfish Altough the challenge itself look the same, I can ensure you that the approach for this challenge is very different from my other challenge. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 30, 2016 at 19:05
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @muddyfish Relevant meta discussion. "Just changing the winning condition" can be a substantial change for a challenge. While it doesn't make sense to post a code-golf, fastest-algorithm and fastest-code for every possible challenge, there are some cases, where exploring a problem from two angles can add a lot of value to the site. I think this is such a case. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 30, 2016 at 19:11
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Wonderful challenge! (+1) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 6, 2016 at 15:50