Timeline for Converting Roman numerals to decimal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2016 at 13:41 | comment | added | bujon | I am not expert but according to wiki there is nothing like a "valid" roman number. ... The "standard" forms described above reflect typical modern usage rather than a universally accepted convention. Usage in ancient Rome varied greatly and remained inconsistent in medieval and modern times... | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 16:11 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg | Generally, XIIX is not considered to be a valid roman number. Each number can only be written in one and only one way with roman numerals. | |
| Oct 13, 2016 at 14:33 | review | Late answers | |||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 16:12 | |||||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 14:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 16:12 | |||||
| Oct 13, 2016 at 14:13 | history | answered | bujon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |