Timeline for What should a C++ error reporting exception class have to be portable across language versions? (ver 1)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2021 at 9:33 | comment | added | Scott McPeak | The intent is an "error reporting class". I did include the concern of portability in the title because many similar questions do not have that constraint; is that your objection? As for the name, this class (albeit renamed) comes from real, working code that is about 10k LOC; I was trying to extract the salient parts (perhaps I trimmed too much). I have asked a new question with revised code and more usage details. | |
| May 18, 2021 at 7:35 | comment | added | Toby Speight | The title still seems to describe your concerns about the code, rather than a description of what it's intended to achieve. The name MyError appears to be a very generic hypothetical example rather than the actual class from real working code, and there's no context showing how it's expected to be used - it would be greatly improved by showing real-world use-cases. | |
| May 18, 2021 at 5:11 | vote | accept | Scott McPeak | ||
| May 18, 2021 at 5:11 | history | edited | Scott McPeak | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Link to revised (ver 2) question |
| May 17, 2021 at 23:37 | answer | added | indi | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 17, 2021 at 23:04 | history | edited | Scott McPeak | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Add Edit 2, responding to user673679's suggestions. |
| May 17, 2021 at 22:14 | comment | added | Scott McPeak | @TobySpeight I've made an edit to add additional information about the purpose. If that's not enough, could you be more specific about what is unclear? Also the meta.codereview links seem to be broken (invalid certificate). | |
| May 17, 2021 at 22:10 | history | edited | Scott McPeak | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Add Edit 1, containing additional information about the purpose of the code. |
| May 17, 2021 at 17:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 20, 2021 at 3:44 | |||||
| May 17, 2021 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/1394306742905942016 | ||
| May 17, 2021 at 10:29 | answer | added | user673679 | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 17, 2021 at 7:59 | comment | added | Toby Speight | Welcome to Code Review! We need to know what the code is intended to achieve. To help reviewers give you better answers, please add sufficient context to your question, including a title that summarises the purpose of the code. We want to know why much more than how. The more you tell us about what your code is for, the easier it will be for reviewers to help you. The title needs an edit to simply state the task, rather than your concerns about the code. | |
| May 17, 2021 at 4:57 | review | First posts | |||
| May 17, 2021 at 10:01 | |||||
| May 17, 2021 at 4:51 | history | asked | Scott McPeak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |