Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack ExchangeStack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack Internal As gllampert pointed out in the comments the value is hardware dependent. You can retrieve it with glGet, using GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNIT. You can find how different hardware performs herehere.
However, in OpenGL 3 there is a lower bound of at least 48 simultaneously used textures, no matter which type. [source]
As gllampert pointed out in the comments the value is hardware dependent. You can retrieve it with glGet, using GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNIT. You can find how different hardware performs here.
However, in OpenGL 3 there is a lower bound of at least 48 simultaneously used textures, no matter which type. [source]
As gllampert pointed out in the comments the value is hardware dependent. You can retrieve it with glGet, using GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNIT. You can find how different hardware performs here.
However, in OpenGL 3 there is a lower bound of at least 48 simultaneously used textures, no matter which type. [source]
As gllampert pointed out in the comments the value is hardware dependent. You can retrieve it with glGet, using GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNIT. You can find how different hardware performs here.
However, in OpenGL 3 there is a lower bound of at least 48 simultaneously used textures, no matter which type. [source]
