Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • So, reading this and your other answer, one query could return, let's say 10, 12, 13, 16 and another concurrent one could return 11, 14, 15, 17, is that right? Each query is going to return a set of unique and strictly increasing integers, which may contain gaps. Commented Nov 20, 2024 at 10:41
  • 1
    @blackgreen: Yes that's right. On second thought, there is even a hack to get sequential numbers after all. I added some black magic. Commented Nov 20, 2024 at 11:04