Skip to main content

Timeline for Phasor to Rectangular Confusion

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 30, 2020 at 19:11 comment added wagboi Thanks for all the added context, folks!
Mar 30, 2020 at 9:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1244550083451981824
Mar 30, 2020 at 8:47 comment added MSalters It might be useful to recall the old observation "All models are wrong; some are useful". Including or excluding the imaginary component is ultimately a matter of practicality, not an absolute truth.
Mar 30, 2020 at 7:43 comment added Massimo Ortolano You might want to have a look at this answer of mine too.
Mar 30, 2020 at 7:14 comment added skvery Have a look at the real and imaginary components of \$V_M\angle \phi\$. \$a = \text{Re}(V_M\angle \phi) = V_M\cos(\phi)\$ and \$b = \text{Im}(V_M\angle \phi) = V_M\sin(\phi)\$. Now \$V_M\angle \phi = a+jb\$. You now have the polar form with components \$V_M\$ and \$\phi\$, and the rectangular form with components \$a\$ and \$b\$. You use the rectangular form to add and subtract, and the polar form to divide and multiply. You can also use the rectangular form to multiply \$(a+jb)\cdot(c+jd) = (ac-bd)+j(ad+bc)\$.
Mar 30, 2020 at 5:55 history became hot network question
Mar 30, 2020 at 5:50 vote accept wagboi
Mar 30, 2020 at 0:29 answer added user57037 timeline score: 3
Mar 29, 2020 at 23:15 answer added Shamtam timeline score: 1
Mar 29, 2020 at 23:09 comment added Mattman944 Remember that a complex number is just a way to represent a point in two dimensions, a phasor is another way.
Mar 29, 2020 at 21:30 review First posts
Mar 30, 2020 at 7:31
Mar 29, 2020 at 21:30 history asked wagboi CC BY-SA 4.0