Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 4
    I don't agree about the duplicate. Question is not about verifying if the address is valid but rather how the address is built and if it follows a format or is just random. Indeed it's not random but the result of some processes. The fact that the word "valid" is in the question is not a criteria, you won't mark all questions with the "valid" word as duplicates ! Commented May 3, 2016 at 15:38
  • 1
    @tayvano I'm not the one who asked this question Commented May 4, 2016 at 5:55
  • 2
    It's totally fine that questions get edited/improved and voted for reopening. Here we go. Commented May 4, 2016 at 11:51
  • Might be worth keeping the comments pointing to possible dupes as they have value in offering a different perspective to those of us doing the learning. Commented Sep 16, 2021 at 19:53