Timeline for Vector problem: which one is the left / centre / right one?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2011 at 22:47 | comment | added | aaaaaaaaaaaa | @bobobobo The word "tværs" means approximately "not aligned", anything that is, by a decent margin, not pointing the same way as something else is "på tværs", it's also a common word for being obstructive. Apart from it's use in the word "tværvektor" it is not a formal mathematical term. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 19:54 | comment | added | bobobobo | What is the literal meaning of tværvector? I'm curious to know. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 15:16 | comment | added | aaaaaaaaaaaa | The problem is that both of the terms normal and perpendicular usually refers to any perpendicular vector, but in this case it is important that a specific normal is selected, so it would be nice to have an unambiguous name. Good job @Lars Viklund for finding a naming instance, now we'll just have to figure how to use it without talking about criminals. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 14:53 | comment | added | bobobobo | I haven't heard the term tværvector before, but I believe you are talking about the normal. The normal is perpendicular to the line. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 14:37 | comment | added | mac | @eBusiness - Thank you for having taken the time to explain the method you suggested. Perfect answer. Accepted. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 14:36 | vote | accept | mac | ||
| Aug 13, 2011 at 14:36 | comment | added | mac | @Lars - Thank you for this comment, that was very useful. Gratitude expressed in form of +1 to your answer! ;) | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 14:18 | comment | added | Lars Viklund | In his book Real-Time Collision Detection, Christer Ericson uses notation of the vector name raised to _|_, which is pronounced "u-perp" for the tværvector to u. As for dot product versus (scalar projection)[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_product#Scalar_projection), I assumed that it was known that the common way to do such a projection was via the dot product. It's most excellent that you covered computing the perpendicular vector, as I forgot to mention the operation. | |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 14:14 | history | edited | aaaaaaaaaaaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 1049 characters in body |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 13:35 | history | edited | aaaaaaaaaaaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Introduced both a new word and a new letter in the English language. |
| Aug 13, 2011 at 13:13 | comment | added | aaaaaaaaaaaa | It's the terminology I learned in school, I do have a different terminological version, but it seems that the English language lacks a word. Screw that, I'll just add the Danish word to the English language. As for the two solutions being virtually the same, Lars Viklund uses a projection where I use a dot product. | |
| Aug 12, 2011 at 23:12 | history | edited | aaaaaaaaaaaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 183 characters in body |
| Aug 12, 2011 at 22:55 | comment | added | mac | Thank you eBusiness, I will look into this more accurately tomorrow, but it seems exactly what I was looking for. :) It's the first time I hear about determinants, and I had a quick look at the wikipedia entry for that, however it seems quite broad in scope. If you happen to have some link that you think would help me understand better the theory behind the solution, I would be grateful if you would share them. :) | |
| Aug 12, 2011 at 21:45 | history | answered | aaaaaaaaaaaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |