In this exercise, we will add support for a basic tunneling protocol to the IP router that you completed in the previous assignment. The basic switch forwards based on the destination IP address. Your jobs is to define a new header type to encapsulate the IP packet and modify the switch code, so that it instead decides the destination port using a new tunnel header.
The new header type will contain a protocol ID, which indicates the type of packet being encapsulated, along with a destination ID to be used for routing.
Spoiler alert: There is a reference solution in the
solutionsub-directory. Feel free to compare your implementation to the reference.
The starter code for this assignment is in a file called basic_tunnel.p4 and is simply the solution to the IP router from the previous exercise.
A P4 program defines a packet-processing pipeline, but the rules within each table are inserted by the control plane. When a rule matches a packet, its action is invoked with parameters supplied by the control plane as part of the rule.
For this exercise, we have already added the necessary static control plane entries. As part of bringing up the Mininet instance, the make run command will install packet-processing rules in the tables of each switch. These are defined in the sX-runtime.json files, where X corresponds to the switch number.
Since the control plane tries to access the myTunnel_exact table, and that table does not yet exist, the make run command will not work with the starter code.
Important: We use P4Runtime to install the control plane rules. The content of files sX-runtime.json refer to specific names of tables, keys, and actions, as defined in the P4Info file produced by the compiler (look for the file build/basic.p4info after executing make run). Any changes in the P4 program that add or rename tables, keys, or actions will need to be reflected in these sX-runtime.json files.
The basic_tunnel.p4 file contains an implementation of a basic IP router. It also contains comments marked with TODO which indicate the functionality that you need to implement. A complete implementation of the basic_tunnel.p4 switch will be able to forward based on the contents of a custom encapsulation header as well as perform normal IP forwarding if the encapsulation header does not exist in the packet.
Your job will be to do the following:
- NOTE: A new header type has been added called
myTunnel_tthat contains two 16-bit fields:proto_idanddst_id. - NOTE: The
myTunnel_theader has been added to theheadersstruct. - TODO: Update the parser to extract either the
myTunnelheader oripv4header based on theetherTypefield in the Ethernet header. The etherType corresponding to the myTunnel header is0x1212. The parser should also extract theipv4header after themyTunnelheader ifproto_id==TYPE_IPV4(i.e. 0x0800). - TODO: Define a new action called
myTunnel_forwardthat simply sets the egress port (i.e.egress_specfield of thestandard_metadatabus) to the port number provided by the control plane. - TODO: Define a new table called
myTunnel_exactthat perfoms an exact match on thedst_idfield of themyTunnelheader. This table should invoke either themyTunnel_forwardaction if the there is a match in the table and it should invoke thedropaction otherwise. - TODO: Update the
applystatement in theMyIngresscontrol block to apply your newly definedmyTunnel_exacttable if themyTunnelheader is valid. Otherwise, invoke theipv4_lpmtable if theipv4header is valid. - TODO: Update the deparser to emit the
ethernet, thenmyTunnel, thenipv4headers. Remember that the deparser will only emit a header if it is valid. A header's implicit validity bit is set by the parser upon extraction. So there is no need to check header validity here. - TODO: Add static rules for your newly defined table so that the switches will forward correctly for each possible value of
dst_id. See the diagram below for the topology's port configuration as well as how we will assign IDs to hosts. For this step you will need to add your forwarding rules to thesX-runtime.jsonfiles.
-
In your shell, run:
make run
This will:
- compile
basic_tunnel.p4, and - start a Mininet instance with three switches (
s1,s2,s3) configured in a triangle, each connected to one host (h1,h2, andh3). - The hosts are assigned IPs of
10.0.1.1,10.0.2.2, and10.0.3.3.
- compile
-
You should now see a Mininet command prompt. Open two terminals for
h1andh2, respectively:
mininet> xterm h1 h2- Each host includes a small Python-based messaging client and server. In
h2's xterm, start the server:
./receive.py- First we will test without tunneling. In
h1's xterm, send a message toh2:
./send.py 10.0.2.2 "P4 is cool"The packet should be received at h2. If you examine the received packet you should see that it consists of an Ethernet header, an IP header, a TCP header, and the message. If you change the destination IP address (e.g. try to send to 10.0.3.3) then the message should not be received by h2, and will instead be received by h3.
- Now we test with tunneling. In
h1's xterm, send a message toh2:
./send.py 10.0.2.2 "P4 is cool" --dst_id 2The packet should be received at h2. If you examine the received packet you should see that is consists of an Ethernet header, a tunnel header, an IP header, a TCP header, and the message.
- In
h1's xterm, send a message:
./send.py 10.0.3.3 "P4 is cool" --dst_id 2The packet should be received at h2, even though that IP address is the address of h3. This is because the switch is no longer using the IP header for routing when the MyTunnel header is in the packet.
- Type
exitorCtrl-Dto leave each xterm and the Mininet command line.
Python Scapy does not natively support the
myTunnelheader type so we have provided a file calledmyTunnel_header.pywhich adds support to Scapy for our new custom header. Feel free to inspect this file if you are interested in learning how to do this.
To make this tunneling exercise a bit more interesting (and realistic) how might you change the P4 code to have the switches add the myTunnel header to an IP packet upon ingress to the network and then remove the myTunnel header as the packet leaves to the network to an end host?
Hints:
- The ingress switch will need to map the destination IP address to the corresponding
dst_idfor themyTunnelheader. Also, remember to set the validity bit for themyTunnelheader so that it can be emitted by the deparser. - The egress switch will need to remove the
myTunnelheader from the packet after looking up the appropriate output port using thedst_idfield.
There are several problems that might manifest as you develop your program:
-
basic_tunnel.p4might fail to compile. In this case,make runwill report the error emitted from the compiler and halt. -
basic_tunnel.p4might compile but fail to support the control plane rules in thesX-runtime.jsonfiles thatmake runtries to install using the P4Runtime. In this case,make runwill report errors if control plane rules cannot be installed. Use these error messages to fix yourbasic_tunnel.p4implementation or forwarding rules. -
basic_tunnel.p4might compile, and the control plane rules might be installed, but the switch might not process packets in the desired way. Thelogs/sX.logfiles contain detailed logs that describing how each switch processes each packet. The output is detailed and can help pinpoint logic errors in your implementation.
In the latter two cases above, make may leave a Mininet instance running in the background. Use the following command to clean up these instances:
make stopCongratulations, your implementation works! Move onto the next assignment p4runtime!
These tests are maintained to support CI/CD and help contributors verify that the solution continues to work correctly across changes. PTF tests are located in the ptf/ directory and run against the solution program.
Documentation on the Usage of Gateway (gw) and ARP Commands in topology.json is here
The documentation for P4_16 and P4Runtime is available here
All excercises in this repository use the v1model architecture, the documentation for which is available at:
