Timeline for Single RegionPlot with different mesh functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 at 21:18 | answer | added | kglr | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 4, 2017 at 9:31 | comment | added | Joost | That's odd... even after clearing my globals, I still get a different plot than you. i.imgur.com/NOuHBEs.png As you see I'm using MM11.1 (on Windows 10). Were you under the impression that ConditionalExpression should have worked here? | |
| Sep 4, 2017 at 9:20 | vote | accept | Joost | ||
| Sep 3, 2017 at 19:37 | answer | added | Lukas Lang | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 19:13 | comment | added | corey979 | Your code produces a different outcome than the plot you posted: imgur.com/a/tk9bP. Also, the PlotLegends -> .... is irrelevant for the question asked. Finally, I'm quite surprised that MeshFunctions -> ConditionalExpression[{#1 + #2 &, #1 &}, -15 + #1 + #2 >= 0 &] (and its variations) doesn't work. | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 19:07 | history | edited | Joost | CC BY-SA 3.0 | copy-paste mistake fixed |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 18:52 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation | edited tags | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 16:36 | history | edited | Joost | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 130 characters in body |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 16:29 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 3, 2017 at 18:34 | |||||
| Sep 3, 2017 at 16:27 | history | asked | Joost | CC BY-SA 3.0 |