Timeline for How to deal with the loss of significant digits in this expression with Fresnel integrals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2019 at 5:12 | comment | added | Yuriy S | @J.M., fair enough. | |
| Nov 13, 2019 at 15:23 | comment | added | J. M.'s missing motivation | "Mathematica using different argument conventions than the commonly accepted ones is really inconvenient." - at the very least, Mathematica's convention is consistent with the one used by the DLMF and Abramowitz and Stegun; perhaps you are merely accustomed to the older (unnormalized) definition for the Fresnel integrals. | |
| Nov 17, 2018 at 22:47 | history | answered | Yuriy S | CC BY-SA 4.0 |