Timeline for CUDALink is not initialized
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2014 at 23:46 | answer | added | Jose Enrique Calderon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 16, 2013 at 22:45 | comment | added | Ziofil | See this answer link. Although it's not a solution that can work for everyone (laptops generally cannot change graphics card), it worked for me. | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 18:13 | comment | added | Ziofil | I contacted Wolfram support. Apparently several other users are affected by this bug, and the developers are looking into it. They will contact me as soon as they have a solution/workaround. I will post as soon as I hear back from them. | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 17:20 | comment | added | Ziofil | @Xerxes, which version of gcc did you use to compile the NVIDIA drivers and the CUDA Toolkit? Are you using CUDA 5.0? | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 19:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/309748633878802432 | ||
| Mar 7, 2013 at 19:13 | comment | added | Xerxes | I have v9.0.1 and am running Ubuntu (precise) with driver 295.41 for a GTX560M. Not having any problem with CUDADot; gives a 3x speedup. | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 18:38 | comment | added | Szabolcs | @HopfMap It seems you're not alone with this issue, so you could consider asking [email protected]. If you manage to work out a solution, please come back and post an answer. Make sure you point them to this comment thread to show that several people are having the same problem on Linux. | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 18:21 | comment | added | b.gates.you.know.what | @Szabolcs Yes I mean it doesn't work for me but all the "CudaChecks" seem ok. It was working on the same machine, previous Fedora release but can't remember which driver version. | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 18:01 | comment | added | Ajasja | Is this 9.0.0 or 9.0.1? | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 17:59 | comment | added | Szabolcs | @b.gatessucks You mean it doesn't work for you either? So is there anyone at all for whom CUDALink works on Linux? | |
| Mar 7, 2013 at 17:20 | comment | added | user6249 | Same problem in Fedora 16 with Mathematica 9. CUDAQ and CUDAInformation works ok. thanks | |
| Mar 1, 2013 at 21:10 | comment | added | b.gates.you.know.what | @HopfMap Same, 304.64. | |
| Feb 28, 2013 at 19:50 | comment | added | Szabolcs | Link to MathGroup version of the same question | |
| Feb 28, 2013 at 10:34 | comment | added | HopfMap | everything in SystemInformation[] -> Links -> CUDA is fine for me, too. Still CUDADot is not working. Could I ask you which is your Nvidia driver version (mine 304.64)? | |
| Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 | comment | added | b.gates.you.know.what | Same for me on Fedora 18; everything in SystemInformation[] -> Links -> CUDA seems fine. | |
| Feb 27, 2013 at 17:36 | comment | added | HopfMap | I've tried CUDAResourcesInstall[Update->True] and CUDAResourcesUninstall[]. CUDADot is still not working. | |
| Feb 27, 2013 at 15:44 | comment | added | Szabolcs | Since you mention that you just upgraded to v9, it may be worth running CUDAResourcesInstall[Update->True]. I had problems with CUDA in 9 because it tried to use the v8 resources. But in that case not even CUDAQ[] gave True. It's probably not the cause of the problem, but it's worth a try. Be prepared for a longish download though. | |
| Feb 27, 2013 at 10:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 27, 2013 at 12:14 | |||||
| Feb 27, 2013 at 10:07 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | I formatted your question. Please read this: editing help. | |
| Feb 27, 2013 at 10:07 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 138 characters in body |
| Feb 27, 2013 at 9:57 | history | asked | HopfMap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |