Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This doesn't solve the OPs problem, which is that ParallelTable only parallelisms with respect to the 1st iterator. If your first iterator is {y,0,59}, it will never use more than 60 kernels, even if a 100 are available. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 6, 2013 at 0:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yikes, I wasn't aware of that limitation. Seems like a really easy thing for them to fix. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 6, 2013 at 0:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, it appears that it only parallelizes over the first index. See @Szabolcs's answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 6, 2013 at 0:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Szabolcs Yep, that is the problem. Is there no way around this then? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 6, 2013 at 0:09