Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

10
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure I understand why you think that the integral is zero based on the derivative? You are saying that eq. $(4)$ in the OP is not correct? Looking at my project as.a whole, it seems to be a consistent value. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 13, 2020 at 22:09
  • $\begingroup$ I see, that's a great idea! Thanks! Is it actually clear that we can commute the limit and the integrals? I mean, I do it in my original post but your answer got me thinking about it. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 14, 2020 at 10:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I now actually think that we can't, but I might be wrong. Here is a simpler example. Consider integrand=x2^2*I12*I13*I24 integrated over $\tau_3$ and $\tau_4$ (MA can handle that easily). Applying your method, we can exchange the derivative and the integral without problem, but interchanging the limit and the integral gives an erroneous $0$. You can try it out with this code: D[integrand, x2]; Assuming[x1 > 0,Integrate[%, {\[Tau]3, -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}, {\[Tau]4, -\[Infinity], \[Infinity]}]]; Limit[%, x2 -> 0, Direction -> "FromAbove"] $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 14, 2020 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the problem arises only at $0$. If you put $x_2 \to 10^{-6}$, then the limits can be interchanged so the script of the original question is still valid I guess. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 14, 2020 at 10:39
  • $\begingroup$ Yes of course, I will also include the definition of $I_{12}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 14, 2020 at 10:46