Timeline for How to refine a boundary mesh with MeshRefinementFunction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2021 at 8:20 | vote | accept | Oscillon | ||
| Feb 5, 2021 at 8:20 | comment | added | Oscillon | Wow that is quite an inspiring workaround :) One might nitpick that there is still a circular edge around the pole due to the uncapping, but in lieu of a better answer I will accept yours. | |
| Feb 5, 2021 at 8:17 | comment | added | Oscillon | Using the distmesh v1.1 from the authors webpage in matlab, I got a refined mesh with distmeshsurface(). If I find the time I will try to port it to mathematica. | |
| Feb 3, 2021 at 18:52 | history | edited | Tim Laska | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Added a spherical end cap version to mitigate some of the high aspect ratio triangles at the poles. |
| Feb 3, 2021 at 4:48 | history | edited | Tim Laska | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Added a 2D mesh refinement mapped to a sphere. |
| Feb 2, 2021 at 15:30 | comment | added | Tim Laska | @Oscillon From @user21's comment, it appears that it is not implemented. You would need more subparts for a smoother transition. I tried "IncludePoints", but I could not get that to work on boundary meshes in 3D. I also looked at the details of DistMesh and it works for 2D only. | |
| Feb 2, 2021 at 5:01 | comment | added | Oscillon | So, spatial refinement for boundary meshes is not implemented yet in Mathematica then? Too bad :( Your workaround is nice, if one would need a smoother transition in triangle sizes, then more subparts are necessary right? Calling distmesh from FEMAddOns migth be another option then I guess. | |
| Feb 2, 2021 at 3:03 | history | answered | Tim Laska | CC BY-SA 4.0 |