Timeline for Defining an output format that doesn't break Ctrl+Shift+I
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2024 at 16:26 | vote | accept | Najib Idrissi | ||
| May 11, 2024 at 16:18 | comment | added | xzczd♦ | BTW, though not quite related to your question, you may want to read this to learn what Notation package actually does: mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/185475/1871 @NajibIdrissi | |
| May 11, 2024 at 16:07 | comment | added | xzczd♦ | @NajibIdrissi I've elaborated a bit with 2 GIFs, see my update. | |
| May 11, 2024 at 16:07 | history | edited | xzczd♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 969 characters in body |
| May 11, 2024 at 15:44 | comment | added | xzczd♦ | @NajibIdrissi Just as you've noticed :) . 1. We don't need to load the package so it's light-weighted. 2. It's actually different from the two way notation of Notation package. Once we define a two way notation with Notation package, all the $a_{i,j}$ will be treated as a[i,j] even if we manually input a, Ctrl+-,i,j or Subscript[a, i, j]. But using my method, a, Ctrl+-,i,j or Subscript[a, i, j] will still be interpreted as Subscript[a, i, j]. In other words, my method doesn't hijack Subscript, it only creates something looks exactly the same as Subscript. | |
| May 11, 2024 at 13:49 | comment | added | Najib Idrissi | Thanks! That works nicely. How does this compare to the Notation package? | |
| May 11, 2024 at 9:40 | history | answered | xzczd♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |