Timeline for Fixing quirky typesetting in plot labels
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 at 17:57 | comment | added | Alexey Bobrick | Psfrag+eps does not seem to work with Mathematica 10. It encodes even one-letter labels so that Psfrag does not recognize them. | |
| May 10, 2013 at 9:11 | comment | added | user0322 | I guess it's better to use rm suggestion for standard use. | |
| Apr 3, 2012 at 23:30 | comment | added | Jens | I too agree with R.M when the question is phrased as a comparison to LaTeX output. What Heike and I are trying to do (if I may speak for Heike) is to show that Mathematica does have a self-contained set of typesetting tools so that we don't have to make LaTeX a requirement for acceptable-looking graphics labels anymore (as indeed it used to be). | |
| Apr 3, 2012 at 21:15 | comment | added | rm -rf♦ | Ok, I have a fix for that. I'll do it when I finish work for the day and ping you about it. | |
| Apr 3, 2012 at 20:56 | comment | added | ArgentoSapiens | This one looks the best (except the italics, which are easy to fix), but I like retaining the ability to share plots without first running them through LaTeX, particularly the LaTeX -> dvips -> ps2pdf workflow that pstricks requires. I agree with your first assertion, but don't tell that to Wolfram. See the sensational first sentence here: reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/guide/… | |
| Apr 3, 2012 at 20:42 | history | answered | rm -rf♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |