Timeline for Fill gap created by Exclusions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 at 10:53 | history | edited | kglr | edited tags | |
| Aug 11, 2014 at 20:01 | vote | accept | Stephen | ||
| Aug 11, 2014 at 20:01 | vote | accept | Stephen | ||
| Aug 11, 2014 at 20:01 | |||||
| Aug 11, 2014 at 19:51 | comment | added | Stephen | I used Mark's suggestion and made the changes suggested by m_goldberg. All worked well. BTW, the "y1" was a typo; it should have been "y0" | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 15:18 | answer | added | kglr | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 14:30 | answer | added | m_goldberg | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 13:53 | comment | added | m_goldberg | Your epilog contains Point[{-4, y1[s]}], but y1 is not defined. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 13:08 | history | edited | Stephen | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 71 characters in body |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 12:59 | comment | added | Mark McClure | You're plotting two different functions and each has a reasonable choice of Exclusions independent of the other. Why don't you use to Plot command and combine the results with Show? You might also try the TrackedSymbols -> {t0,s} in your Manipulate command. Finally, with 9 questions now asked, I think it would be reasonable for you to properly format your code - it's just a matter of indenting your code block four spaces. | |
| Aug 10, 2014 at 12:47 | history | asked | Stephen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |