Skip to main content

Timeline for How can I improve NumberString?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 12, 2015 at 19:22 comment added Simon Woods @Mr.Wizard, the new pattern is definitely cleaner and it appears to work perfectly. Thank you.
Feb 12, 2015 at 19:10 comment added Mr.Wizard Simon, I updated my answer with what I think is a much cleaner pattern. Would you please test it? If it passes I'll probably remove the old one entirely.
Feb 9, 2015 at 9:18 vote accept Simon Woods
Feb 4, 2015 at 7:50 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/562880898006540289
Feb 3, 2015 at 21:50 comment added Simon Woods @ChipHurst, for my needs I just need to handle explicit numbers with precision marks and scientific notation, though if you have a method that can handle named constants too it would be interesting to see it. My original problem was to examine the box form of expressions and determine whether strings containing a backtick were numbers or symbols with context marks. I was surprised to discover that NumberString didn't work for this.
Feb 3, 2015 at 19:30 comment added Greg Hurst "I would like to test strings to see if they represent numbers." How strict are we talking here? Do you want the string "EulerGamma" to be considered a number, or are you referring to number in the sense of NumberQ?
Feb 3, 2015 at 18:55 answer added Kuba timeline score: 4
Feb 3, 2015 at 15:24 answer added wuyingddg timeline score: 4
Feb 3, 2015 at 15:22 comment added Simon Woods @Mr.Wizard, no, I'm not planning to self answer. Yes, safety is basically the only reason - it would be okay to create a held expression for example.
Feb 3, 2015 at 15:17 answer added Mr.Wizard timeline score: 4
Feb 3, 2015 at 14:57 comment added Mr.Wizard Also, is your reason for not converting to expressions only for safety as stated?
Feb 3, 2015 at 14:56 comment added Mr.Wizard Are you going to self-answer? I may dig into this if not.
Feb 3, 2015 at 14:18 history asked Simon Woods CC BY-SA 3.0