Timeline for A better "VisibleSpectrum" function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2020 at 1:44 | comment | added | David G. Stork | These supernumerary bows have nothing whatsoever to do with "harmonic resonance," at least as such words mean. | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 13:56 | comment | added | evanb | The "echoes" are called supernumerary bows. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow#Supernumerary_rainbow | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:43 | comment | added | Sam Watkins | Mr.Wizard, yes that's correct. Perhaps I'll have a go at translating it into Mathematica... | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:31 | history | edited | Sam Watkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 52 characters in body |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:30 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | Subjectively the yellow in your photo looks more intense than the one in your smooth spectrum; I take it your intent is not to replicate the photo but instead to produce a pleasingly smooth gradient, correct? | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:29 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | Sam, welcome to Mathematica Stack Exchange. I appreciate you posting this despite what I am about to say: if you do not have Mathematica an/or are unfamiliar with its language it will be difficult for you to meaningfully participate here. If you choose to participate you should focus on clear English descriptions of algorithms or approaches rather than code in another language. | |
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:27 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:38 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2015 at 17:24 | history | answered | Sam Watkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |