Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • $\begingroup$ I ran this and checked emesh["Coordinates"] and emesh["BoundaryElements"]. It doesn't seem like these elements conform. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2015 at 12:32
  • $\begingroup$ On second inspection, I think this does in fact conform, but the ordering of the nodes on emesh["BoundaryElements"] is different between the two circles. I think I could still work with this. Thank you. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2015 at 13:13
  • $\begingroup$ @qdice First, yes, I'm not sure the order can be controlled, if you let automatic meshing occur. Second, I think I figured out something else that might have been confusing you about the correspondence of the boundary points. (See "Issue" in update.) Third, I added an alternative that conforms more closely to the specs in your question. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 28, 2015 at 15:20