Timeline for On [underhanded], [code-trolling] and [obfuscation]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19 at 18:06 | comment | added | caird coinheringaahing Mod | While, nominally, I like this, I think it'd need to be very closely watched once policy changed. The last thing we want is for people to see it emblazoned across the site that [underhanded] is no longer banned, and take that as tacit permission to start spam posting the kind of low quality nonsense we had before. Ideally, it should be treated like [pop-con] : functionally banned, but the occasional high-quality challenge be allowed, instead of simply being closed because "it's tagged with this specific tag" | |
| Jul 18 at 5:35 | comment | added | The Fifth Marshal | Given that I have flags that have been pending since April I'm far from convinced that harping moderator capacity will cure-all here. | |
| Jul 18 at 0:25 | comment | added | Albert Renshaw | +1 I'm of course biased here, but this seems like a good path forward, at least experimentally. As it currently stands site activity is in a decline due to a larger trend of StackExchange as a whole, so quality submissions should be encouraged. An excellent moderation team is already in place on this site and it is not as if we are overwhelmed with content needing review. I have full faith in the community's ability to be reasonable when it comes to content quality and, as with all tags, any are of course prone to low quality content, but that's why we have moderation in the first place. | |
| Jul 17 at 15:16 | history | answered | Themoonisacheese | CC BY-SA 4.0 |